re: Forcefem and "Forcemasc" (cw discussion of SA, kink, transmisogyny, reclaimed slurs)
@YKantRachelRead second part fair.First part however, doesn't exactly explain that a lot.
You've said that it removes the subversion away from forcefem, my problem is that, I don't see how is that happening.
If anything, if that part was removed, it was not because of forcemasc but because of how forcefem got popularized as a joke or a "standard" (as in, people just seem to fantasize about it regardless of being cis or trans) kink.
At this point I don't see forcemasc as a harm to forcefem, not because it has or does not have impact, but simply because, at least from what I've seen, forcefem has no longer any real impact on anything, since it's not taken seriously (in terms of subverting how forcefemming someone is viewed) anymore.
Maybe I am missing something but at this point whenever I see forcefem mentioned it's either a joke or a kink.
And if its used this way, then I think forcemasc has no real impact on tramsfems.