re: Forcefem and "Forcemasc" (cw discussion of SA, kink, transmisogyny, reclaimed slurs)@YKantRachelRead
"forcemasc" isn't subversive because there's nothing to subvert. maleness is the default under patriarchy. there was never any kink revolving around women force-masculinizing other women to fuck them, because women are at the lowest rung of the cisnormative gender hierarchy.
I didn't say that, this does not answer what I asked in any way.
the sentiment behind it - that is, rape culture and the resulting epidemic of violence - remains and, if anything, is more pervasive than ever.
I agree! But that is also not really what I meant by this, because what I've said is that reclaiming "forcefem" has no longer impact on those issues, because it was watered down, not by forcemasc but by the fact it became a joke or kink. If I was looking into issues with forcefem I'd start with that not the fact some people decided to make their own version of it.
...and transfems are regularly shouted down and canceled for mentioning it in those contexts.
This too is irrelevant to forcemasc. It is an issue, I agree! But how is that related to forcemasc being a thing. (Not to mention that forcemasc was also being shouted down by transfems, the whole tumblr drama revolving isff and isfm was not one-sided at all)
